Author Archives: Jean-Paul

Book Review: My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 5/5 stars

A word of warning about “My Brilliant Friend”: This is a book best read in physical book form. The reason being there are a lot of characters and it is very difficult to keep track of who’s who and what their relationship to anyone is and Mrs. Ferrante graciously recognized this and adorned the front of the book with a cast of characters which you will likely have to consult often. It becomes unwieldy to flip back and forth when using an e-reader.

A second word of warning: This is a book that doesn’t end. I mean, there’s a last word that ends the book, but it is more of an abrupt end than an ending with any sort of closure. This is highly annoying to certain people. I think it’s worth it. So be prepared to read all four books in the series if you’re looking for actual closure. I say this not knowing how book four ends, though perhaps a hint is shown in how book one begins. I can already attest that book two opens right where book one ended so it makes sense that the others would continue and we would come full circle to the beginning of book one.

“My Brilliant Friend” is a beautiful and violent portrayal of friendship between two girls, Elena and Lila, growing up in a poor section of Naples in the 1960s. Theirs is a unique relationship formed by both differences and commonalities, by intelligence and competition, by jealousy and love. The story is told by Elena so we get to see her worries and insecurities in a very raw form and we see Lila solely through Elena’s eyes as a confident and slightly enigmatic person. It is unclear throughout whose sphere of influence is stronger, though Elena would surely say that Lila’s was and Lila would likely find it an uninteresting question. Their friendship is also tinged with deep affections and you get the feeling that, if Lila moved close and kissed Elena, a dam would break and the two would get lost in each other forever. I am certain that Lila would need to be the one to initiate it. I am less certain that Lila would feel anything if she did or if she would just do it to see what would happen. Both Elena and Lila are fascinating character studies and I found myself imagining throughout the book what the two would do in certain situations.

Many people will be shocked by the level of day to day violence portrayed in “My Brilliant Friend”. Those people likely did not grow up poor. Being poor is like Atlas carrying the crushing weight of the world on his shoulders at all times. That weight never goes away and is at times unbearable and it is in those unbearable times where the violence occurs. It is anger, yes, but it is also frustration at things beyond one’s control made manifest in the forms of kicks and punches towards those who happen to be at hand. I did not grow up in that environment, but I grew up adjacent to it and have born witness.

Ferrante is Italian and the original novel was written in Italian. Like any wonderfully written book translated from its original language to my native English, I wonder what intricacies of words, what intimacies of phrase are lost in the translation. Obviously, the translators did a brilliant job for “My Brilliant Friend”, otherwise I would not have liked it as much as I did, but I also find myself longing to read the novel in its original form so I can catch all the nuances of language that are untranslatable. If only time were infinite.

After reading “My Brilliant Friend”, I certainly know what the next three novels I am going to read are. This is just book one of a four part series called the Neapolitan Novels. Having just started book two, “The Story of a New Name”, I can already say that I am as enraptured with the second book as I was with the first. It is going to be a good couple of reading months.

Movie Review: The Equalizer 2

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 2/5 stars

Bottom Line: A poorly developed plot interspersed with a bunch of pointless vignettes. Denzel is still Denzel, though.

“The Equalizer 2” starts out pretty strong with Robert McCall (Denzel Washington) kicking ass and taking names on a train to Istanbul. We are treated to McCall’s OCD tendencies and his smooth, calm fighting style against impossible odds. At this point, I believed I was in for a treat of a movie. The opening sequence is followed by a murder half way around the world that is obviously the set up for the main plot. It then moves to a montage of McCall driving people around Boston as a Lyft driver and helping out some of them with their problems. This is genuinely touching. But then he continues to be a Lyft driver and continues to be a Lyft driver and has moments with his friend Susan Plummer (Melissa Leo who I completely didn’t recognize and love) and continues to be a Lyft driver and beats some bros up and continues to be a Lyft driver and attempts to mentor a gang banger and continues to be a Lyft driver and FINALLY we get to the main plot of the woman and dude murdered in the second scene.

The biggest flaw in this movie is that the main plot is so poorly developed. We never learn why the people who were killed in the beginning had to die. It is extremely unclear why other people had to die to cover up the first murders besides a general “they were getting too close trope”. It is also frustrating that McCall basically solves the entire thing from his armchair at home instead of dashing around the world like he does in the opening scene. The main plot also uses the aforementioned gang banger (now reformed because McCall can do anything) in a way that makes zero difference at all to the story. Why they chose to include him in the main plot is beyond me. Oh, and there’s also a hurricane because why not? And the movie is two hours!

Denzel Washington is still fun to watch act and his “beat up the bad guys” scenes are fun to watch and well choreographed, but Denzel Washington and violence do not a good movie make. It is too bad this movie is so poor because the whole idea of an Equalizer is pretty good and you’d think there’s a lot of material to work with. Really, I think the movie would have been better off if McCall just had just driven around Boston and helped his fares for two hours.

Movie Review: Ant-Man And The Wasp

Jean-Paul’s rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: Fun and funny. Creatively choreographed growing/shrinking sequences. Yay, a female superhero who gets title billing! And another good and believable villain!

Ant-Man (Paul Rudd) is back and once again he is a delightful comedic escape from the more serious Marvel universe. This time he’s paired with the Wasp (Evangeline Lilly (I love that first name)), Hank Pym’s (Michael Douglas) daughter. After a brief interlude in which it is explained how Wasp/Hope van Dyne became the Wasp, since it was not alluded to at all in the first movie and basically is “your mother is lost in the quantum realm and we can save her and oh, here’s her suit”, we see Scott Lang/Ant-Man under house arrest after his antics in “Avengers: Civil War”. Unlike the first “Ant-Man” movie, this time establishment scene and the mid-credit teaser are all that we really see into the larger Marvel universe. This is a good thing. It lets Ant-Man be Ant-Man.

Once again, we are treated to a compelling villain! If Marvel keeps this up, I may start believing they’re getting good at it. This time it’s Ghost/Ava (Hannah John-Kamen) who is trying to create the quantum tunnel that Hope and Hank are also trying to accomplish, but by more villainous means. Everything she does makes sense. It’s refreshing. Not only that, but this movie is, I believe only the second film where a female superhero gets movie title billing. Only other one being “Electra”. Given, it’s shared title billing, but the dam is starting to break. Next up is “Captain Marvel” which is also about a female superhero! Yay!

Unlike the first “Ant-Man” movie, this one also features some wonderfully choreographed action sequences. The use of both Wasp’s and Ant-Man’s shrinking abilities is used to great effect and we are treated to Wasp running down the blade of a knife that is thrown at her and using a quickly enlarged salt shaker to prevent a bad guy’s escape. I guess most of it was actually Wasp. Ant-Man was in this movie too, I swear. More for comedy relief, I guess.

Hey, I just realized that I liked the sequel better than the original. That doesn’t happen very often. “Ant-Man and the Wasp” is definitely a worth watching movie and its comedy give it great replay value too. It’s not necessarily a need to see it in the movie theater type of movie, but you’ll be happy if you watch it now instead of waiting for, what is it these days, three months?

Movie Review: Ocean’s Eight

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: Exudes sexy-cool from every pore. A classic crime caper complete with a capable coterie of criminal con artists.

“Ocean’s Eight” has a lot going for it. Nowhere can this be seen more so than in the relationship between Debbie Ocean (Sandra Bullock) and Lou (Cate Blanchett). If con artists are capable of having best friends, Debbie and Lou are best friends. Their interactions are just so casual and organic. You just want to BE there with them. Soak them in. Revel in their interactions and their banter. You won’t have your watch, your wallet, your bank account, and quite possibly your house if you do so, but it would be worth it just to experience them. Cate Blanchett is just wonderful as Lou. She has this casual-cool to her with a sexy I-don’t-give-a-whit strut and a slightly stoned seen-everything-know-everything look. Even the way she chews her gum just exudes confidence.

The story is pretty standard heist film fare. In this case, an overly complicated plot to steal a ridiculously expensive necklace with a hidden other plot of revenge and a few bonus thefts thrown in. It’s fun watching them put it together and it’s fun watching them execute it. It helps that it’s all done under the grandiose backdrop of the Met Gala so it also features wonderful works of art both in the traditional sense and in the fashion sense. The only thing that didn’t quite work for me was the “catch”, that part where a wrench is thrown into the precisely planned caper. In this case, “catch” is both literal and figurative so maybe they did it just for that wink-nod, but it didn’t really add much to the overall enjoyment of the film and it was introduced and cleaned up without much fanfare.

What we have here is a pretty decent heist film and if you like heist films, you will enjoy “Ocean’s Eight”. If you like fashion, you will also probably like “Ocean’s Eight”. If you like an assembly of strong, confident women, you will also probably like “Ocean’s Eight”. In summary, you’ll probably like “Ocean’s Eight” and it is a worthy addition to the franchise. It has also done pretty good at the box office so I have my fingers crossed for more Debbie and Lou antics in the near future.

Movie Review: Tag

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: You would think that a movie about a kid’s game being played by adults would be bad. You would be wrong.

Yes, this is a movie about a bunch of grown men playing tag. Yes, you should be wondering who in their right mind would create a movie about such a thing. Yes, it seems impossible that a movie with such a premise would ever be even remotely close to good. And yet, here we are. “Tag” is a super fun and funny movie that also has heart. Whodathunkit?

The movie starts with Hogan Malloy (Ed Helms) infiltrating his friend Bob Calahan’s (Jon Hamm) company and interrupts Bob’s interview with Wall Street Journal reporter Rebecca Crosby (Annabelle Wallis) in order to tag him and to get him in to the plot to get the gang together to tag the ever elusive Jerry Pierce (Jeremy Renner) who has never once been tagged it. Rebecca decides to drop her story about Bob’s company and follow this crew in their quest. The cast is rounded off by Randy Cillano (Jake Johnson) and Kevin Sable (Hannibal Buress) as the tag crew and Hogan’s extra competitive wife, Anna Mallory (Isla Fisher). All are a delight and have a great chemistry where you can actually believe that they were childhood friends.

Besides the laughs, of which there are plenty, this movie also has heart. It’s kind of emotionally manipulative the way it has heart, but it has heart nonetheless. Behind it all is the not-Ben Franklin quote, “We don’t stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” Friendships are things to be treasured. Miles may separate you. Cities may separate you. States may separate you. Continents may separate you. Never forget who your friends are. They are the family you choose. Reach out to them today. Give me a moment, I’m all verklempt!

Yay for fun, silly movies! We can all use a bit more fun and a lot more silliness in our life and “Tag” fits the bill nicely. Get all your friends together and see this movie and rediscover what it is to go out and play! By sitting there. In the dark. In a theater. Watching a movie. I can’t remember where I was going with this.

Movie Review: Solo: A Star Wars Story

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 3/5 stars

Bottom Line: Nothing great. Nothing horrible. Acting is meh. Except for Donald Glover. He rocks. Some scenes were cool. Some were annoying. Some made no sense.

So yeah, they did a Han Solo (Alden Ehrenreich) movie and it was fine. There’s really not much else to say about it. The movie puts to the big screen almost every throw away line uttered by Han Solo during Episodes IV-VI with some extra thrown in to show how Han met Lando Calrissian (Donald Glover) and Chewbacca (Joonas Suotamo).

The end.

Ok, not really.

The acting in the movie is pretty shaky all around except for Donald Glover’s Lando. Boy, did he Billy Dee the heck out of Lando! He had ALL that casual cool. I look forward to Donald Glover’s future Colt 45 commercials and they really need to do a Lando movie. The rest of the cast is effective at times and downright bad at times. They can be somewhat forgiven for this because the script can generously be called pretty good for a Star Wars script. There is one exception to the bad acting and that would be L3-37 (Phoebe Waller-Bridge) who was just about perfect as a feisty droid’s rights droid. Though some people who shall remain nameless and are CLEARLY wrong thought L3 was annoying.

And speaking of annoying, here is an incomplete list of all the things that annoyed me about this movie: the entire beginning, the escape from Corellia, the Kessel run, that stupid space monster, whatever the heck that stupid sliding move was that they did to the Millennium Falcon, what they did to L3, the double crosses (ok, I kind of love/hated this), the Jedi that appears with absolutely no explanation, Han speaking Wookie (though in fairness, this was pretty hilarious).

I don’t really see this movie as much worth watching unless you are a Star Wars fan. It’s a good movie for the Star Wars universe, but there’s not much value add as a one off movie for someone to just go see. But yes, if you like the Star Wars universe, this is a pretty fun background story to one of your favorite characters.

Book Review: The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 3/5 stars

“The Poisonwood Bible” is a strange novel that would probably fit into the historical fiction genre. It starts in the Belgian Congo in 1969. Yes, Belgium still controlled the Congo in 1969. The story follows the Price family as the evangelical father, Nathan, packs up his family and moves them from the U.S. to the Congo to convert the natives to Christianity. The novel is broken up into a few sections, each of which starts with a chapter from the mother Oleanna’s point of view at a time after she has returned to the U.S. These chapters are foreboding and foreshadow horrible things to come for the Price family in Africa. The rest of each section is then told from the point of view of one of the four Price sisters; Rachel (15), Leah (14), Adah (14), Ruth Mae (5).

Much of the beginning of the book is dedicated to the Price family’s travails in adjusting to Congolese life in the village of Kilanga. It is, needless to say, distinctly different from life back in the States. This part of the book, I found mostly dull and without much interesting to say. It then moves on to the Price girls somewhat starting to fit in to the village and interacting with its inhabitants while around them the Congo is slouching towards a very messy independence. Things start getting interesting here as it dawned on me what year the novel takes place and I recognized the horrible messiness that is to come. It was more than just that, though. When the children actually start acculturating, it is a learning experience for the reader as well. This section of the book is a very enjoyable read. Then all the foreshadowed bad things happen and the rest of the book follows the girls, now women, through their adulthood. I have huge problems with how things get here. Major turning points are either unexplained or poorly explained, I am not sure which. Despite that complaint, this section is also pretty interesting as the women go their separate ways and scatter throughout Africa and the United States.

I did enjoy Kingsolver’s use of the different voices for different chapters for the most part. The Adah portions I loved with her palindromes and reading styles, though by the end it got a little stale. Adah was still my favorite character, though. Leah’s life was the most interesting to read about. Kingsolver did a pretty good job of bringing the mind of the 5-year-old Ruth Mae to life as well. Then there was Rachel whom I absolutely hated. She would use the incorrect words constantly and never learn or grow. I know there are people like that, but they rarely come from the same family in my mind. Maybe I’m wrong. Her story arc was interesting, though, despite my dislike of her character and how it was written.

It is possible that much of the book is lost on me not having grown up with sisters and thus not really understanding the sisterly dynamic. I do not think so, though. The books flaws are deeper than that. It’s still a decent read, though. Not sure I agree with all the acclaim surrounding it. That might just be the Oprah effect, though.

Movie Review: Incredibles 2

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 3/5 stars

Bottom Line: Incredibly weird introductory short. Main movie has moments, but often feels lost. The Jack Jack stuff is fun and inventive as is the final fight sequence.

Let’s talk about “Bao”, shall we? There’s going to be some pretty big SPOILERS here because I don’t know how else to talk about this short without revealing the big moment so skip this paragraph if you’d rather not know. “Bao” is the introductory short that has become a mainstay of the Pixar universe. Boy, is it weird. And depressing. A Chinese woman makes bao (Chinese dumplings) for her husband who quickly devours them and leaves her to go to work.Feeling ignored and sad, she eats her bao alone. Her last Bao suddenly comes alive and anthropomorphizes. She raises the Bao from infancy to adulthood in a series of touching vignettes. When the Bao brings home a white girlfriend and is going to leave with her to start its own life. She begs and pleads with the Bao to stay, but the Bao insists on leaving. Instead of allowing this to happen, the woman eats the Bao. Holy crap, yes, she just ate the Bao! WTF?!?! She immediately regrets it and is super sad about it, but the damage is done. The Bao is gone. It is all then revealed to be a dream as her real son who looks very much like the Bao comes home with his white girlfriend and mother and son reconcile and they all make bao together. There is so much to unpack here. First off, let it be said that I am not remotely “Bao”‘s target audience; no kids, no plans to have any, and I abhor parental possessiveness as if children are something you own. But while the plot did not speak to me, there is a lot to learn from the short. Chinese culture permeates “Bao”. There’s the woman’s marriage, the woman’s possessiveness, the woman’s downright rancor at the son going out with a white girl, and I’m sure many other aspects that I just don’t understand. The best thing about “Bao” is how refreshingly honest it is. It is also the first Pixar short directed by a female, which is awesome/sad. Out of 20 films, just one woman. Maybe that will change now.

On to “Incredibles 2”! I have less to say about this one. It was, at points, fun, but there was a lot of setup and the plot is kind of see-through. It is definitely one of Pixar’s lesser endeavors. That doesn’t mean it’s not worth watching, though. Everything with Jack Jack is hilarious and well choreographed. The family dynamic is interesting, if a little stereotypical. They get into the inherent sexism of that stereotyping, though, which is nice. The final fight scene is pretty darned cool as all the various Supers use their powers in interesting ways. Of course, we have to ignore that there was a much simpler solution to the entire problem to see it all, but whatevs!

Somewhat surprisingly, the children in the theater (of which there were unsurprisingly many) really seemed to dig the movie despite what I considered slowness. At least one parent also really liked the movie as she laughed loudly at just about everything. Her laughter was often more funny than what was occurring on screen. So yeah, kids like it, parents like it, I thought it was fine and worth seeing. Even Pixar’s poorer attempts tend to be good enough to be worth seeing. What else is there to say?

Movie Review: Deadpool 2

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 5/5 stars

Bottom Line: Cheekily recreates the magic of the first movie. Cable is awesome.

As is explained very early on, “Deadpool 2” is a family movie. Given, you should almost certainly not take your family to go see it given its copious swearing and mindless violence, but a family movie nonetheless. Also given, the family Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) surrounds himself with is kind of dysfunctional, but they are the people he chooses to be with and not the people he was born to. This is a very important lesson. Family is what you make of it, not who was able to insert tab A into slot B. And sure, some family will inevitably get hit by a bus or fall into a wood chipper, but that’s just life. You enjoy your chosen family for the time you have with them.

I was very skeptical going into “Deadpool 2” whether they would be able to pull off the pure magic of the first “Deadpool“. They did. Some of my friends even say that the second movie is better than the first. I disagree, but it is certainly the first’s equal. It has the same smarmy Ryan Reynolds and wonderful writers. He is joined this time by Cable (Josh Brolin), who is one of the cooler villains produced by the Marvel Universe. I am unclear about how pretty much everything Cable is actually works, but it’s pretty cool! Plus Brolin’s Cable plays a pretty effective straight man to Reynold’s Deadpool.

It is unfortunate that the movie starts with the women in refrigerators trope that is all to common in comics as well as mainstream movies, but no movie is perfect (Also, you should totally watch all of Anita Sarkeesian’s “Tropes vs. Women” series. She is awesome.). From that unfortunate and lazy plot point, the movie moves to firmer ground of mother and daughter in refrigerators in order to introduce Cable. Sheesh, people, women don’t have to die for men to do stupid or heroic or evil things. Let’s re-retcon “Deadpool 2” for the lazy writers, shall we? Ok, Deadpool, having been told by the love of his life, Vanessa (Morena Baccarin) that she wants to have a baby with him but is uncertain of his ability to be a father, swears to prove that he is a capable father by teaming up with Vanessa, who also has super powers of her own, to…the rest of the movie. Hey, this is easy! Alright, Cable! Cable, seeing how much death and destruction one human being has caused and not wanting his wife and daughter to join that ever growing death count travels back in time to kill Hitler. Done! Academy Award please! See, women don’t have to die to further a plot.

Now that I’ve gotten that off my chest, go see “Deadpool 2” because it really is fun. There are certainly “Deadpool” marathons in my future because both will definitely hold up well for repeat viewings.