Foodie Review: Le Pressoir d’Argent

Jean-Paul’s rating: 4/5 stars

Bonjour mes amies! I had the distinct pleasure of dining at Le Pressoir d’Argent, Gordon Ramsey’s two Michelin star restaurant in Bordeaux, France, with six of my closest friends. It was an absolutely wonderful gastronomic experience and I am supremely lucky that so many people could share it with me.

The restaurant is located on the second floor of the Hotel Intercontinental and the man at the front desk showed us to a little alcove which contained the elevator that led us up to the restaurant. We were greeted immediately by a young woman with close cropped black hair and an inviting smile and shown to our seats. Our party having taken two cabs and ours arriving first, we selfishly arranged ourselves with our backs to the wall so that we may observe the goings on in the restaurant. I love watching restaurants operate. Good restaurants move in a motion that resembles a dance and Le Pressoir d’Argent moves like a waltz. The women all have short pixie style hair or pulled up into a severe bun and are dressed elegantly, but conservatively, and the men all have short hair and suits which match the conservative style of the women. The people bringing the food from the kitchen wear black gloves and stiffly walk the meals to the tables as others swoop in to distribute the courses to the table.

Le Pressoir d’Argent is know most of all for its lobster and the decor reflects that. The walls are adorned with sea shells and pictures that are almost x-rays showing close ups of various crustaceans are strategically placed around the restaurant. There was almost a Little Mermaid “Under the Sea” feel to it and given its heavily seafood menu, some of us could be heard singing “Les Poissons” from time to time. Les Poissons, les poissons, how I love les poissons! Yeah, we’re all class. My only complaint about the ambiance was the room was entirely too warm, which led to us guzzling 70 Euros worth of water. Ah, Europe and your non-free water! Given how much we spent for the meal, 10 Euros a piece for water isn’t a big deal, but you’d expect better temperature control for an exclusive restaurant like this. This is the only reason why I am not giving a five star rating. Everything else was phenomenal.

All seven of us had the six course tasting menu. The menu was provided to us in both French and English due to my very French sounding name, which was a very nice touch. I also partook of the wine pairing which was done blind. They would serve the wine with the course and the sommelier would come by at the end of the course and let you guess what it was. I got one right. Go me!

The Tasting Menu

I started the meal with a fancy drink whose name I cannot recall, but it was delightful and refreshing and served with a sturdy paper straw.

Oh drink! I do not remember your name, but you were delicious!

As expected in restaurants of the quality of Le Pressoir, we were treated to a few tiny delectable before the official menu started. I should really take notes because I don’t remember what they were either. The highlight was the almost sushi style tidbit with roe on top, but the skewer of meat served along side it was also wonderful.

This amused douche loved the amuse-bouches

We were also treated to a delightful salad of some sort before finally getting to the tasting menu. It was creamy and basily and almost too beautiful to eat.

Salad done right

Finally, we get to the tasting menu! First dish was Bazas beef tartar in oyster cream with Aquitaine caviar and sorrel. It was served on a bed of salt in a glass covered dish and smoke trickled out of the salt when the cover was lifted. Both Bazas and Aquitaine are the locations of where the beef and caviar, respectively, were sourced. It was served with a white wine that paired perfectly with it. I am not much of a white wine fan, but this trip to Bordeaux opened my palette to whites like none before have. The problem with a blind tasting and my inexperience with white wines is my not remembering which wines paired with which dishes and sadly, the picture I took of the bottles is a bit blurry. I am only slightly sure that this was a Chablis. I would gladly drink this wine alone.

Beef tartar

The second course was Saint-Jean-du-Luz spider crab served under avocado with pomelo, coriander, radishes, and a citrus dressing. Pomelo is a kind of citrus fruit. This was probably the most beautiful of the dishes and with the most subtle of flavors. I’m pretty sure this was served with a Riesling. I am not a fan of Rieslings and this one was no exception, but it did pair wonderfully with the dressing which cut the sweetness of the wine which is my primary complaint about Rieslings.

Spider crab hiding under avocado

Course three was wild turbot baked in seaweed with razor clams, cockles, bigorneau, Swiss chard, and fregola. Bigorneau are sea snails and fregola is a tiny pasta. This was also served on a covered glass dish with poofs of smoke when uncovered. Goodness was this delicious! So many wonderful flavors that mixed together so well! It was served with a white wine that I do not recall at all what it was, but notice that they served it in a red wine glass typically used for Bordeaux wines. I have only been served whites in a red glass twice and I always forget to ask why. I suspect it is because they are younger wines that, like reds often need to, require a bit more aeration than usual.

Tasty turbot

Course four was my favorite, not for the food itself, though that was spectacular, but the star of this course was the wine. This one I distinctly remember not only because it was the only red but because I guessed it right! Ok, I guessed the region right. Everything else I got wrong. It was a Bordeaux. It was bold and complex and I wish I could drink the entire bottle and would die happy if it was the only wine I ever drank again. When asked how old I thought the wine was, I guessed ten years, maybe fifteen, knowing that if he was asking, it must be fairly old. It was a 1993! This excellent wine was paired with roasted Pyrenees veal in organic cereal ragout and a side of wild mushrooms and turnip. This was excellent veal and well worth raving about, but I cannot stop thinking about the wine.

I really should have put the wine in front of the veal

And now for a slow intermission from the meal for cheese! Oh cheese, I love you so! We let our helpful server choose a nice selection of cheeses for us. I was too busy drooling all over myself to remember to take a picture of the cheese cart and too eager to dig in to the cheese plate to remember to take a picture of the pristine plate, though I did remember half way in. I can’t recall the names of all the cheeses of which we partook, but I have fond memories of the Stilton blue cheese, the Camembert, and an Epoisses that was made differently that your normal Epoisses, and this wonderful hard cheese which was probably my favorite, but I don’t at all recall the name.

A partially eaten cheese plate

The intermission continued with a surprise tour of the kitchen where we got to meet the head chef and the pastry chef. I have never done this before and it was quite cool to watch the well oiled (I assume with olive oil) machine of the kitchen humming on all cylinders. We were a large group and quite in the way so our visit was short, but enjoyable.

Yes chef!
Performing culinary magic

Course five was a perfectly pleasant palette cleanser of fennel sorbet in a green apple and mint emulsion. It was a welcome respite from the heaviness of the cheese and the veal. Fluffy and full of flavor. I did not get a wine with the sorbet and I feel cheated. Ok, not really, but it would have been really interesting to see what they chose to pair with it.

Sorbet with a see through top. Sexy!

It was at this point that the sommelier came out with the wines I had partaken of so far. He talked of the wines with passion and I pretended to understand him. I should have asked for him to stage the bottles in the order they were served, but was not thinking of it at the time. Maybe they were in reverse order? If that’s true the Chablis was in the red wine glass and the first white wine shall forever be lost to the blurry photos. I highly recommend that you go out right now and buy yourself a bottle of the 1993 Chateau d’Armailhac and share it with those you love best.

When you gonna let me be sober?

And now for the final course! Or is it? Dun dun duuuuuuun! Course six was a delightful desert of fig leaf parfait, juniper leather, roasted figs, and verjus. Verjus is the juice of unripe grapes. I have no idea what juniper leather is. It was served with a sweet almost pruny wine that I never did get the name of because we were quickly approaching hour four of our meal and the rest of my party was starting to get cranky and would soon need to be tucked in to bed. It was the perfect ending dessert course to a perfect meal.

It fig-ures?

But wait, there’s more! This was really my meal. Everyone enjoyed it, but no one would have been there if not for me. It was also relatively close to my birthday, give or take a few weeks, so everybody’s favorite vacation planner decided to tell them that it was my birthday. Le Pressoir d’Argent treated me with this stupendous birthday treat:

Happy Birthday to me!

Look how excitingly beautiful that is! Candle and all. And all fancy and such! At that point, I was wondering how all of us were going to be able to eat this giant cake boat covered in chocolate with a solitary half ball of ice cream sitting all lonely in the bow. Alas, the only edible part of the concoction was the ice cream. The rest was just for show and inedible. Beautifully inedible. The ice cream was delish. We also got some desertlettes, which you can kind of see in the boat picture there, but at this point of the meal I was so full that they didn’t make much of an impression.

The warmth of the restaurant was a small mar in an otherwise wonderful experience. The service was superb and the food was phenomenal. Le Pressoir d’Argent has charm that is equal to the charm of the city of Bordeaux itself. I am happy I was able to partake of both and to share them with a table full of some of my favorite people.

Movie Review: Crazy Rich Asians

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: A fun movie that delves deep into Asian culture. And tells the story from a mostly female point of view! Boy, do I want to visit Singapore now!

Goodness, this was a fun movie! “Crazy Rich Asians” somehow perfectly walks the line of silly, serious, outlandish, and down to earth. And while I’m sure that there is so much more for Asians that uncultured white boys like myself couldn’t even fathom the context of, it is also completely accessible to us uncultured white boys as well.

“Crazy Rich Asians” tells the timeless tale of girl meets boy. Boy asks girl to go to a wedding with him. Girl finds out boy is rich. Girl finds out boy is obscenely rich. Girl has to meet boy’s obscenely rich and…colorful family. The girl in question is Rachel Chu (Constance Wu who you may recognize from “Fresh Off the Boat”), an economics professor born and raised in the United States, and the boy is Nick Young (Henry Golding), of the Singaporean Youngs, a real estate tycoon family whom everyone in Singapore knows. They are joined by an absolutely wonderful supporting cast including Michelle Yeoh, Gemma Chan, Awkwafina, Ken Jeong, and Ronnie Chang, just to name a few.

What’s great about this movie is it’s mostly about women and told by women, but at the same time there are men in it and they are also real men and not just comedy side pieces, though they are definitely eye-pleasing pieces. From start to finish, it’s just strong women being strong, but also living real life and going through real life predicaments. Well, also while being ridiculously rich, except for Rachel Chu who is just strong and not rich.

You will be forgiven if you sometimes wonder if you are watching a movie or a tourism commercial for Singapore. “Crazy Rich Asians” showcases Singapore in all of its beauty and glory and decadence. Goodness, did I have some travelers envy watching parts of this movie. Singapore has definitely moved up in places I want to visit soon.

“Crazy Rich Asians” is based off of book one in a series of books by Kevin Kwan. It has been a wonderful success and deservedly so. We can only hope that success translates into the other two movies being made as well. It is heartening to see that epic stories featuring an almost exclusively non-white cast be successful. There are so many of these stories yet to be told and so many worth hearing.

Movie Review: Mission: Impossible – Fallout

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 3/5 stars

Bottom Line: A fun action movie that falls short of its “Mission: Impossible” brethren. Ugh, Henry Cavill.

I’ve always enjoyed the introduction to the “Mission: Impossible” mission. You know, the “your mission, should you decide to accept it” stuff. As if there were any doubt that Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) would ever turn down a mission. In “Fallout”, they go almost old school. The entire scene is very noir-ish and reminiscent of the old TV series. It was a great homage to the movie series’ roots.

Apart from the introduction, the rest of the movie is pretty standard spy thriller fare. There are acts of heroism and double crosses and masks and gadgets and villains on both sides and chase scenes and last second rescues. It’s all fun, but nothing really stands out. Well, except for the 15 minute timer that ticks down for what seems like 30 minutes. The problem with consistently producing a predictable product is that it becomes harder and harder to build tension. You know people will have bulletproof vests on. You know it’s going to be a mask. You know when the counter reads 00:00:01, the bomb will be defused. There is still cleverness to be found in the movie, but mostly, it’s all been done before.

And then there’s Henry Cavill. He plays August Walker, a CIA agent assigned to babysit the IMF team. There are tree stumps that have more personality than he does, though wooden does perfectly describe his acting. Cavill is who you call when the casting director says, “What this role needs is a man with a very square jaw.” The only way to give Cavill any sense of gravitas is to stick him in a Superman suit.

At two hours and twenty-seven minutes, the movie could certainly do with a trimming, especially in the second half. An action movie without an involved plot just doesn’t need to be that long. That the movie was still enjoyable despite its length says something about the longevity of the series’ formula, though. There will probably be even more sequels to come and I will probably continue to watch them because, while they’re not always the greatest, “Mission: Impossible” movies are always fun.

Book Review: My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 5/5 stars

A word of warning about “My Brilliant Friend”: This is a book best read in physical book form. The reason being there are a lot of characters and it is very difficult to keep track of who’s who and what their relationship to anyone is and Mrs. Ferrante graciously recognized this and adorned the front of the book with a cast of characters which you will likely have to consult often. It becomes unwieldy to flip back and forth when using an e-reader.

A second word of warning: This is a book that doesn’t end. I mean, there’s a last word that ends the book, but it is more of an abrupt end than an ending with any sort of closure. This is highly annoying to certain people. I think it’s worth it. So be prepared to read all four books in the series if you’re looking for actual closure. I say this not knowing how book four ends, though perhaps a hint is shown in how book one begins. I can already attest that book two opens right where book one ended so it makes sense that the others would continue and we would come full circle to the beginning of book one.

“My Brilliant Friend” is a beautiful and violent portrayal of friendship between two girls, Elena and Lila, growing up in a poor section of Naples in the 1960s. Theirs is a unique relationship formed by both differences and commonalities, by intelligence and competition, by jealousy and love. The story is told by Elena so we get to see her worries and insecurities in a very raw form and we see Lila solely through Elena’s eyes as a confident and slightly enigmatic person. It is unclear throughout whose sphere of influence is stronger, though Elena would surely say that Lila’s was and Lila would likely find it an uninteresting question. Their friendship is also tinged with deep affections and you get the feeling that, if Lila moved close and kissed Elena, a dam would break and the two would get lost in each other forever. I am certain that Lila would need to be the one to initiate it. I am less certain that Lila would feel anything if she did or if she would just do it to see what would happen. Both Elena and Lila are fascinating character studies and I found myself imagining throughout the book what the two would do in certain situations.

Many people will be shocked by the level of day to day violence portrayed in “My Brilliant Friend”. Those people likely did not grow up poor. Being poor is like Atlas carrying the crushing weight of the world on his shoulders at all times. That weight never goes away and is at times unbearable and it is in those unbearable times where the violence occurs. It is anger, yes, but it is also frustration at things beyond one’s control made manifest in the forms of kicks and punches towards those who happen to be at hand. I did not grow up in that environment, but I grew up adjacent to it and have born witness.

Ferrante is Italian and the original novel was written in Italian. Like any wonderfully written book translated from its original language to my native English, I wonder what intricacies of words, what intimacies of phrase are lost in the translation. Obviously, the translators did a brilliant job for “My Brilliant Friend”, otherwise I would not have liked it as much as I did, but I also find myself longing to read the novel in its original form so I can catch all the nuances of language that are untranslatable. If only time were infinite.

After reading “My Brilliant Friend”, I certainly know what the next three novels I am going to read are. This is just book one of a four part series called the Neapolitan Novels. Having just started book two, “The Story of a New Name”, I can already say that I am as enraptured with the second book as I was with the first. It is going to be a good couple of reading months.

Movie Review: The Equalizer 2

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 2/5 stars

Bottom Line: A poorly developed plot interspersed with a bunch of pointless vignettes. Denzel is still Denzel, though.

“The Equalizer 2” starts out pretty strong with Robert McCall (Denzel Washington) kicking ass and taking names on a train to Istanbul. We are treated to McCall’s OCD tendencies and his smooth, calm fighting style against impossible odds. At this point, I believed I was in for a treat of a movie. The opening sequence is followed by a murder half way around the world that is obviously the set up for the main plot. It then moves to a montage of McCall driving people around Boston as a Lyft driver and helping out some of them with their problems. This is genuinely touching. But then he continues to be a Lyft driver and continues to be a Lyft driver and has moments with his friend Susan Plummer (Melissa Leo who I completely didn’t recognize and love) and continues to be a Lyft driver and beats some bros up and continues to be a Lyft driver and attempts to mentor a gang banger and continues to be a Lyft driver and FINALLY we get to the main plot of the woman and dude murdered in the second scene.

The biggest flaw in this movie is that the main plot is so poorly developed. We never learn why the people who were killed in the beginning had to die. It is extremely unclear why other people had to die to cover up the first murders besides a general “they were getting too close trope”. It is also frustrating that McCall basically solves the entire thing from his armchair at home instead of dashing around the world like he does in the opening scene. The main plot also uses the aforementioned gang banger (now reformed because McCall can do anything) in a way that makes zero difference at all to the story. Why they chose to include him in the main plot is beyond me. Oh, and there’s also a hurricane because why not? And the movie is two hours!

Denzel Washington is still fun to watch act and his “beat up the bad guys” scenes are fun to watch and well choreographed, but Denzel Washington and violence do not a good movie make. It is too bad this movie is so poor because the whole idea of an Equalizer is pretty good and you’d think there’s a lot of material to work with. Really, I think the movie would have been better off if McCall just had just driven around Boston and helped his fares for two hours.

Movie Review: Ant-Man And The Wasp

Jean-Paul’s rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: Fun and funny. Creatively choreographed growing/shrinking sequences. Yay, a female superhero who gets title billing! And another good and believable villain!

Ant-Man (Paul Rudd) is back and once again he is a delightful comedic escape from the more serious Marvel universe. This time he’s paired with the Wasp (Evangeline Lilly (I love that first name)), Hank Pym’s (Michael Douglas) daughter. After a brief interlude in which it is explained how Wasp/Hope van Dyne became the Wasp, since it was not alluded to at all in the first movie and basically is “your mother is lost in the quantum realm and we can save her and oh, here’s her suit”, we see Scott Lang/Ant-Man under house arrest after his antics in “Avengers: Civil War”. Unlike the first “Ant-Man” movie, this time establishment scene and the mid-credit teaser are all that we really see into the larger Marvel universe. This is a good thing. It lets Ant-Man be Ant-Man.

Once again, we are treated to a compelling villain! If Marvel keeps this up, I may start believing they’re getting good at it. This time it’s Ghost/Ava (Hannah John-Kamen) who is trying to create the quantum tunnel that Hope and Hank are also trying to accomplish, but by more villainous means. Everything she does makes sense. It’s refreshing. Not only that, but this movie is, I believe only the second film where a female superhero gets movie title billing. Only other one being “Electra”. Given, it’s shared title billing, but the dam is starting to break. Next up is “Captain Marvel” which is also about a female superhero! Yay!

Unlike the first “Ant-Man” movie, this one also features some wonderfully choreographed action sequences. The use of both Wasp’s and Ant-Man’s shrinking abilities is used to great effect and we are treated to Wasp running down the blade of a knife that is thrown at her and using a quickly enlarged salt shaker to prevent a bad guy’s escape. I guess most of it was actually Wasp. Ant-Man was in this movie too, I swear. More for comedy relief, I guess.

Hey, I just realized that I liked the sequel better than the original. That doesn’t happen very often. “Ant-Man and the Wasp” is definitely a worth watching movie and its comedy give it great replay value too. It’s not necessarily a need to see it in the movie theater type of movie, but you’ll be happy if you watch it now instead of waiting for, what is it these days, three months?

Movie Review: Ocean’s Eight

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: Exudes sexy-cool from every pore. A classic crime caper complete with a capable coterie of criminal con artists.

“Ocean’s Eight” has a lot going for it. Nowhere can this be seen more so than in the relationship between Debbie Ocean (Sandra Bullock) and Lou (Cate Blanchett). If con artists are capable of having best friends, Debbie and Lou are best friends. Their interactions are just so casual and organic. You just want to BE there with them. Soak them in. Revel in their interactions and their banter. You won’t have your watch, your wallet, your bank account, and quite possibly your house if you do so, but it would be worth it just to experience them. Cate Blanchett is just wonderful as Lou. She has this casual-cool to her with a sexy I-don’t-give-a-whit strut and a slightly stoned seen-everything-know-everything look. Even the way she chews her gum just exudes confidence.

The story is pretty standard heist film fare. In this case, an overly complicated plot to steal a ridiculously expensive necklace with a hidden other plot of revenge and a few bonus thefts thrown in. It’s fun watching them put it together and it’s fun watching them execute it. It helps that it’s all done under the grandiose backdrop of the Met Gala so it also features wonderful works of art both in the traditional sense and in the fashion sense. The only thing that didn’t quite work for me was the “catch”, that part where a wrench is thrown into the precisely planned caper. In this case, “catch” is both literal and figurative so maybe they did it just for that wink-nod, but it didn’t really add much to the overall enjoyment of the film and it was introduced and cleaned up without much fanfare.

What we have here is a pretty decent heist film and if you like heist films, you will enjoy “Ocean’s Eight”. If you like fashion, you will also probably like “Ocean’s Eight”. If you like an assembly of strong, confident women, you will also probably like “Ocean’s Eight”. In summary, you’ll probably like “Ocean’s Eight” and it is a worthy addition to the franchise. It has also done pretty good at the box office so I have my fingers crossed for more Debbie and Lou antics in the near future.

Movie Review: Tag

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 4/5 stars

Bottom Line: You would think that a movie about a kid’s game being played by adults would be bad. You would be wrong.

Yes, this is a movie about a bunch of grown men playing tag. Yes, you should be wondering who in their right mind would create a movie about such a thing. Yes, it seems impossible that a movie with such a premise would ever be even remotely close to good. And yet, here we are. “Tag” is a super fun and funny movie that also has heart. Whodathunkit?

The movie starts with Hogan Malloy (Ed Helms) infiltrating his friend Bob Calahan’s (Jon Hamm) company and interrupts Bob’s interview with Wall Street Journal reporter Rebecca Crosby (Annabelle Wallis) in order to tag him and to get him in to the plot to get the gang together to tag the ever elusive Jerry Pierce (Jeremy Renner) who has never once been tagged it. Rebecca decides to drop her story about Bob’s company and follow this crew in their quest. The cast is rounded off by Randy Cillano (Jake Johnson) and Kevin Sable (Hannibal Buress) as the tag crew and Hogan’s extra competitive wife, Anna Mallory (Isla Fisher). All are a delight and have a great chemistry where you can actually believe that they were childhood friends.

Besides the laughs, of which there are plenty, this movie also has heart. It’s kind of emotionally manipulative the way it has heart, but it has heart nonetheless. Behind it all is the not-Ben Franklin quote, “We don’t stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” Friendships are things to be treasured. Miles may separate you. Cities may separate you. States may separate you. Continents may separate you. Never forget who your friends are. They are the family you choose. Reach out to them today. Give me a moment, I’m all verklempt!

Yay for fun, silly movies! We can all use a bit more fun and a lot more silliness in our life and “Tag” fits the bill nicely. Get all your friends together and see this movie and rediscover what it is to go out and play! By sitting there. In the dark. In a theater. Watching a movie. I can’t remember where I was going with this.

Movie Review: Solo: A Star Wars Story

Jean-Paul’s Rating: 3/5 stars

Bottom Line: Nothing great. Nothing horrible. Acting is meh. Except for Donald Glover. He rocks. Some scenes were cool. Some were annoying. Some made no sense.

So yeah, they did a Han Solo (Alden Ehrenreich) movie and it was fine. There’s really not much else to say about it. The movie puts to the big screen almost every throw away line uttered by Han Solo during Episodes IV-VI with some extra thrown in to show how Han met Lando Calrissian (Donald Glover) and Chewbacca (Joonas Suotamo).

The end.

Ok, not really.

The acting in the movie is pretty shaky all around except for Donald Glover’s Lando. Boy, did he Billy Dee the heck out of Lando! He had ALL that casual cool. I look forward to Donald Glover’s future Colt 45 commercials and they really need to do a Lando movie. The rest of the cast is effective at times and downright bad at times. They can be somewhat forgiven for this because the script can generously be called pretty good for a Star Wars script. There is one exception to the bad acting and that would be L3-37 (Phoebe Waller-Bridge) who was just about perfect as a feisty droid’s rights droid. Though some people who shall remain nameless and are CLEARLY wrong thought L3 was annoying.

And speaking of annoying, here is an incomplete list of all the things that annoyed me about this movie: the entire beginning, the escape from Corellia, the Kessel run, that stupid space monster, whatever the heck that stupid sliding move was that they did to the Millennium Falcon, what they did to L3, the double crosses (ok, I kind of love/hated this), the Jedi that appears with absolutely no explanation, Han speaking Wookie (though in fairness, this was pretty hilarious).

I don’t really see this movie as much worth watching unless you are a Star Wars fan. It’s a good movie for the Star Wars universe, but there’s not much value add as a one off movie for someone to just go see. But yes, if you like the Star Wars universe, this is a pretty fun background story to one of your favorite characters.